THE latest of three local (Newcastle, Australia) rail-corridor studies on coal dust was released last week. I published an opinion piece on the confusion these duelling dust studies are causing in the community.
The
first study was released by the Australian Rail Track Corporation
(ARTC) in October 2012. It had multiple limitations and was dismissed by
community activists. Under the auspices of the Coal Terminal Action
Group (CTAG), they responded by designing and conducting their own
community-funded study of coal dust in Newcastle and the Lower Hunter
coal train corridor.
The community study also had multiple
limitations including - according to Professor Howard Bridgman, the
consultant to the study - an inability to reliably calibrate the
particle monitors.
Now the ARTC has released the third study of
coal dust in the rail corridor. CTAG has dismissed this and says it will
begin fund-raising to conduct a fourth study.
Many members of the
community are confused by the duelling claims of health impacts and the
uncertainty surrounding each of the studies. Uncertainty about health
impacts is itself a source of psychological stress and a cause of poor
health. More here